![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Peacemaker continued; page 2/4
Preparing of the Case for Mediation
Preparation is the key to mediation
advocacy. Be prepared to present your case fairly and to
respond to your opponent’s points, both factual and
legal. Give the mediator sufficient ammunition to move your
opponent toward your position.
In a personal injury case, understand the
medical issues. If you need expert assistance, get it. If there
are issues of permanency, be prepared with an informed opinion,
whether you decide to share it or not. Understand the medical
bills. Will there be future care? If so, at what cost?
Have a full understanding of the liens.
This has become much more complicated with the legal
controversy around the reimbursement of ERISA, Medicare, and
Medicaid liens,
Understand the settlement options,
including structured settlements, or special needs trusts.
Understand the strengths of your case, but
most importantly, understand the weaknesses. Your opponent
certainly will.
Research verdicts and settlements in
similar cases to formulate a concept of value. No two cases are
exactly the same, but showing a number of verdicts and
settlements in similar cases, will strengthen your case at
mediation.
Part of your preparation should be making
sure the mediator is prepared. Your mediation submission,
whether a formal brief or a simple letter, should describe, not
only the strengths of your case, but also the weaknesses. You
are much more credible if you acknowledge your problems.
If you’re representing a plaintiff
with pre-existing injuries, acknowledge them. If your defendant
has prior issues of alleged misconduct, denying them will not
make them go away. In other words, describe your case, warts
and all. Unless you are disclosing something that is not
otherwise discoverable, my advice is to exhibit the same candor
with your opponent. The process is confidential so nothing you
say will come back to bite you afterwards.
Preparing Your Client for Mediation
Be honest with yourself and your client
about the strengths, and particularly the weaknesses, of your
case. Only then can you come close to assessing the risks of
trial vs. settlement.
Effective Communication
To effectively communicate with the other
side and make a deal, you first need to know who is actually
making the decisions. Is it the actual party, him or herself?
Is it a spouse, employer or friend? Is it the lawyer on the
pleadings, or maybe an in-house lawyer? An adjuster or claims
manager? Maybe a CEO? If it is unclear to you, ask. The more
you know about who is driving the other side, the better
opportunity you have to tailor your communications accordingly.
Once you figure out who is driving the
train, think about what that person(s), or company needs out of
this settlement, and figure out a way to deliver that, without
compromising where you can’t. Sometimes its as simple as
a sincere apology. Sometimes it’s important for one
party, or both, to maintain confidentiality. This can be a
wonderful opportunity for creativity.
Even in personal injury cases, where the
deal is usually about agreeing on a sum of money to compensate
the plaintiff, creativity helps. What does an adjuster need out
of a settlement, except the obvious, closure and elimination of
risk? The adjuster has a boss somewhere looking over his or her
shoulders. That adjuster needs to be able communicate about how
he or she saved the company money or eliminated a big risk.
In employment cases, or business disputes,
there are a myriad of non-monetary items that can make up a
settlement, depending on the parties’ interests in
maintaining the relationship, not harming a reputation, or
dealing with tax issues.
The importance of listening is too often
overlooked. If you’re in a room with the other side,
listen to what they are saying. Don’t interrupt.
Oftentimes they are communicating subtle clues about what might
be involved in a successful settlement. When you’re with
mediator, listen to what he or she is saying. Even if the case
doesn’t settle you can learn what to expect at trial.
A big issue for trial lawyers,
particularly in Oregon, where discovery is not as extensive as
elsewhere, is how much to share with your opponent. As a
mediator, I firmly believe that the more you share, the more
likely you are to settle your case. However, as a lawyer who
has tried cases for 30 years in Oregon, I recognize the value
of a good surprise at trial. Ask Austin Crowe, my friend and
adversary, from whom I kept the fact that a key witness, after
his deposition, had undergone hypnosis to refresh his
recollection of the events.
My advice is to share anything that is
otherwise discoverable. Your opponent will find out eventually,
so why not at mediation where it might help drive a settlement.
As far as “surprises” go, dole
them out carefully. If the parties are close enough that
sharing might close the deal, then share, even if it’s
communicated in a general way through the mediator. Remember
that the mediator can only share what you allow him or her to
share.
next page | 2/4
|
![]() |
|||
|
Copyright 2008 by
Jeffrey Foote Mediation. All rights are reserved.
Portland+Mediator
Portland+Mediation Personal+Injury+Mediation Medical+Negligence+Mediation Dental+Negligence+Mediation Product+Liability+Mediation Employment+Mediation Construction+Defect+Mediation Commercial+Case+Mediation Portland+Super+Lawyer |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|